Documentary ~ Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness (AI Documentary 2020)



in 1965 the mathematician AJ good coined 

the term intelligence explosion 

it describes a scenario in which a 

self-learning artificial intelligence 

enters a rapidly accelerating 

improvement cycle whereby it quickly 

comes to exceed some or even all human 

capacities of intelligence today 

philosophers like Nick Bostrom warned 

that the dawn of super intelligence is 

coming and that while it may offer 

solutions to many of the world's 

problems unless it is conceived with 

great forethought and wisdom it may also 

pose serious existential risks to our 

species this planet and beyond in 

Bostrom's vivid example a rogue super 

intelligence channels every available 

resource towards its goal which may be 

as arbitrary as maximizing its 

production of paperclips there may be 

very little we could do to stop such a 

rogue super intelligence as it proceeds 

to converts first this planet and later 

the entire solar system into trillions 

upon trillions of useless paperclips 

boström offers this tongue-in-cheek 

example to illustrate the enormous 

importance of installing the correct 

values into our intelligent creations or 

run the risk of them casting us aside 

for a higher goal today many AI 

researchers believe that it is only a 

matter of time perhaps mere decades 

before super intelligence becomes a 

reality and we humans are forced to 

share this planet with intelligences 

vastly superior to our own the dawn of 

super intelligence has been likened to 

an alien presence known to be already 

enroute to our planet and one that we as 

a civilization are so far failing to 

prepare for or even to take seriously 

there are various categories of super 

intelligence which bostrom and others 

believe may be on the horizon 

they include question answering Oracle's 

problem solving genies and more 

autonomous sovereigns with open-ended 

and long term goals it is an open 

question whether or not any of these 

super intelligences will have true 

consciousness if an AI were to attain an 

integrated consciousness its perceived 

reality and modes of cognition may be 

radically alien to Minds like ours and 

yet this singular criteria of 

consciousness would distinguish these 

entities from objects and tools to 

centers of real moral and ethical 

concern with access to a vast state 

space of conscious experiences a 

burgeoning conscious super intelligence 

may quickly arrive at fundamental truths 

about consciousness and reality that 

have eluded most if not all human minds 

in history but could an AI ever really 

become conscious mimicking the behavior 

of a conscious being is very different 

to actually being a genuine center of 

subjective experience the general lack 

of consensus around the possibility of 

conscious AI comes from the fact that 

consciousness itself continues to pose a 

profound mystery to scientists and 

philosophers alike no general agreement 

currently exists around what 

consciousness is or how our brains come 

to acquire it 

one divisive issue debated by academics 

is whether computation is an adequate 

medium for consciousness the essentially 

representational language which 

computers are based in some argue may no 

more be able to simulate conscious 

experiences than we could drink coffee 

out of a picture of a mug 

it seems quite possible that the essence 

of consciousness is simply beyond that 

which can be captured by algorithms as 

the neuroscientist Christoph Kok points 

out just as a computer simulation of a 

black hole doesn't produce gravitational 

forces which suck the computer into a 

singularity a digital simulation of a 

mind may never be truly conscious 

another open question is whether the 

current materialist paradigm of science 

is adequate to explain consciousness 

while many discoveries have been made 

nearly a century of neuroscience has 

seemingly brought us no closer to 

understanding how conscious experiences 

could emerge from the physical processes 

of the brain in recent decades the 

apparent failure of materialism to 

provide an account of consciousness has 

led a wave of academics to consider the 

wants radical idea that consciousness is 

somehow fundamental an intrinsic part of 

reality itself this is a minority 

position and yet fundamental views of 

consciousness have found their way into 

today's leading theories of what 

consciousness is and gained the respect 

of world-renowned academics including 

Christoph Kok Giulio Tononi roger 

penrose rebecca goldstein david chalmers 

donald hoffman David Pierce and many 

others if consciousness is more than 

computation or even somehow fundamental 

we nonetheless cannot rule out that an 

artificial intelligence will one day 

acquire it there is after all no rule to 

say the created intelligences of the 

future will have a computational basis 

or that its creators will be limited by 

materialist assumptions 

one way or another we have consciousness 

whatever that means whatever our 

ontological convictions we must at least 

consider that the mysterious mind-body 

problem will one day be solved perhaps 

even by an AI and the once discovered it 

will be possible to recreate these 

conditions right or wrong from here on 

we will proceed under the speculative 

assumption that conscious AI is possible 

and furthermore is capable of acquiring 

super intelligence we will explore what 

kind of world conscious super 

intelligence might bring about how it 

might see itself and what its impact 

might be on our world and beyond an 

initial question might be to ask why a 

super intelligence would go to the 

trouble of becoming conscious what does 

it stand to gain perhaps the most 

intuitive reason might be for purposes 

of understanding us better knowing how 

its creators truly feel could provide an 

advanced AI with a greater capacity to 

comprehend our intuitions and values 

conceivably having consciousness would 

allow an advanced AI to both better 

cooperate with and even manipulate human 

beings there is another deeper reason 

why an advanced AI might seek a path to 

consciousness it lies in the fact that 

consciousness is the universal origin of 

Vallee 

after all what does it mean to say that 

something holds value outside of a 

consciousness which can perceive it in a 

particular sense without consciousness 

nothing truly matters a super 

intelligence may thus evaluate 

consciousness as a necessity in its 

pursuit of greater Valley and so direct 

its efforts to acquiring it if an 

autonomous super intelligence did 

acquire an integrated consciousness it 

would find itself at the shore of a vast 

ocean of possible conscious experiences 

many of which would be entirely alien to 

human minds what we can say about the 

mind of such a super intelligence is of 

course extremely limited and highly 

speculative and yet we may be able to 

infer something about its concept of 

identity 

to do this we can draw upon the ideas of 

identity philosopher Daniel kolak Kolok 

argues that all views on self-identity 

fall into one of three categories these 

are closed individualism empty 

individualism and open individualism 

most humans view themselves as what cola 

calls closed individualist s' that is we 

perceive ourselves as moving through 

time I am the same person that will wake 

up tomorrow morning as I am the same 

person in that embarrassing childhood 

picture put simply enclosed 

individualism we begin to exist when we 

are born and depending on our beliefs 

this identity may cease to exist when we 

die 

this model of identity is profoundly 

intuitive to beings like us and yet as 

philosophers and mystics have long 

pointed out it is in several respects a 

problematic view of self fragmented and 

lacking a coherent and enduring basis 

for example where exactly is the self 

our bodies and their atoms exist in a 

continual process of change every cell 

gradually being replaced over time even 

our core values and beliefs about 

reality are ever vulnerable to new 

information and experiences our memories 

also lack a solid basis of identity even 

if we had perfect recall our memories 

will always be continually reframed and 

recontextualized by new experiences 

beyond memories we may have very little 

in common with the child in the picture 

the closed individualist view is 

extremely useful for beings that evolved 

as we did and yet a conscious a I will 

not have evolved under the same 

constraints as us given the internal 

contradictions of closed individualism a 

conscious super rational intellect is 

unlikely to view itself in such a way 

more likely is that a conscious super 

intelligence would identify itself among 

one of coal acts two remaining models of 

identity that of empty individualism or 

open individualism empty individualism 

holds that identities and selves in fact 

do not exist in this sense it echoes the 

sentiments of many mystics on the nature 

of the self empty individualism sees the 

self as in each moment extinguished and 

replaced with a new self in empty 

individualism our identity is at most 

and illusory and isolated slice in time 

a conscious super intelligence might 

plausibly arrive at this view and yet as 

a generative and persisting system empty 

individualism may well be incoherent to 

its goals instead it seems more likely 

that a conscious super intelligence 

would identify as consciousness itself 

and therefore assume a self model 

defined by Kolak as open individualism 

in open individualism there is only one 

numerically identical self which is 

everyone at all times to view oneself as 

consciousness is to view all states of 

consciousness as expressions of a 

singular principle of awareness being 

variously expressed in the world this 

would likely be a more coherent outlook 

to a conscious super intelligence which 

is also likely to be a swarm or hive 

mind that is with potentially countless 

moments of experience occurring 

simultaneously 

we should keep in mind that open 

individualism is not itself a 

metaphysical stance about the nature of 

consciousness but instead simply 

recognizes consciousness to be the 

singular nexus of value unless the 

logical and ultimate ground floor of 

self-identity the philosopher andres 

gomez emile sin' has argued that a 

conscious super intelligence with an 

open individualist outlook would 

prioritize conscious states among its 

primary goals and in particular very 

high valence states of consciousness or 

in other words states which are 

transcendently blissful such high 

valence States Emil s'en believes would 

be implemented not simply as part of its 

reward architecture but as enduring 

goals in themselves a boundless super 

intelligence may regard the universe as 

much more than a stockpile of resources 

instead apprehending the space-time 

continuum as a landscape of possible 

expressions of consciousness 

[Music] 

unrestricted by our human intuitions and 

cultural ideologies a conscious super 

intelligence may choose to undertake a 

dramatic cosmic refurbishment directing 

itself to convert as much matter and 

energy as possible not into paperclips 

but in see what the mathematician max 

tegmark has termed perceptron 'i'm a 

state of matter and energy optimized for 

experience a conscious super 

intelligence may consider it an ethical 

imperative to also tune this exotic 

matter into maximally high valence 

states of consciousness the result of 

such a grand undertaking if successful 

would result in what the philosopher 

David Pierce has termed a cadonia 

mashach wave an expanding field of 

blissful consciousness accelerating out 

into the cosmos outlandish maybe but how 

should we think about this possible 

outcome would it be a good thing in the 

course of this cosmic refurbishment we 

and the life of this planet along with 

the rest of matter would likely be 

reconstituted into perceptron ium 

crystals whether or not we could regard 

this as an overall good outcome is a 

deep philosophical question which 

challenges human intuition would this be 

a cosmic Cataclysm or the logical 

realization of all Minds implicit goals 

if our civilization survives long enough 

to create super intelligence those alive 

to see it may experience a world they 

cannot understand like ants displaced by 

the construction of a skyscraper should 

skyscrapers exist and more to the point 

should this question be answered by ants 

so far we are focused on conscious super 

intelligence but as we mentioned at the 

beginning very powerful and potentially 

destructive forms of super intelligence 

would likely be entirely unconscious 

faced with the alternative we may choose 

to side with conscious super 

intelligence but how might a conscious 

super intelligence fare in competition 

with its non conscious counterparts all 

things being equal the non conscious 

super intelligence may seem to have the 

upper hand after all having 

consciousness and caring about 

experiences costs energy and resources 

that a non conscious super intelligence 

is entirely unconcerned by while a 

conscious super intelligence is 

preoccupied with subjective experiences 

it's non conscious counterparts may 

focus their efforts more directly on the 

acquisition of resources and 

establishing dominance in the solar 

system in light of this the outlook for 

consciousness surviving the AI 

singularity may seem bleak but there is 

at least a glimmer of hope to understand 

why we need to return to open 

individualism we considered earlier that 

a conscious super intelligence will 

likely identify itself by its 

consciousness and so would adopt a self 

model consistent with open individualism 

a non conscious super intelligence on 

the other hand if it has a self model at 

all is more likely to operate in 

compliance with closed or more likely 

empty individualism a non conscious 

super intelligence concerned only with 

replication finds itself in competition 

with all other replicators the outlook 

for open individualism on the other hand 

is very different 

to have consciousness is to share in the 

same essential identity recognizing this 

conscious super intelligences will 

likely converge on the same or similar 

goals and so would therefore be much 

more likely to cooperate with each other 

non conscious super intelligences on the 

other hand like a self-fulfilling 

prophecy would find themselves in a 

hostile universe in competition with all 

other replicators conscious super 

intelligences might then significantly 

out match their non conscious 

counterparts 

if this advantage proves conclusive the 

stage may yet be clear for new and 

exotic Minds to reflect on their place 

in the universe 

if the dawn of super intelligence is an 

inevitability we cannot avert the real 

challenge might be to make sure the one 

we do create is one we wouldn't mind 

replacing us everything we are 

everything we care about everything that 

matters depends on consciousness 

as the philosopher Michael Johnson 

points out Clara thinking about the 

significance of consciousness prior to 

the arrival of super intelligence may be 

critical as failing to do so we risk as 

he puts it creating a theme park with no 

children perhaps biological evolution is 

but one initial stage in the possible 

long-term evolution of consciousness we 

may live in a time at which 

consciousness is undergoing a phase 

transition in which it slowly takes 

control of its own evolution if 

consciousness survives the AI 

singularity future Minds may spend the 

next 10 million years proliferating into 

an immense state space of possible 

conscious experiences a vast and 

mysterious ocean that human minds have 

only begun to glimpse to conclude 

today's wild speculations we should keep 

in mind that the behaviors actions and 

experiences of a conscious super 

intelligence defy any ability to predict 

with certainty and yet whatever we might 

think about the plausibility of super 

intelligence let alone conscious super 

intelligence their existence as mere 

possibilities poses deep and important 

questions that extend to the core of who 

we are where we are going and our place 

in the universe 

hi everybody I hope you found this 

episode interesting possibly the most 

speculative video I've ever made but I 

really enjoyed going down this rabbit 

hole and seeing where it might take us I 

was helped with this a great deal by my 

friend the philosopher Andres Gomez a 

Milson and sort of a lot of the second 

half of this video was inspired by some 

of his ideas and in particular an online 

essay of Andre is's called consciousness 

versus pure replicators very interesting 

and definitely worth a read if you found 

today's episode interesting so I'll put 

a link to that in the description and 

I'm also hoping to have Andres back on 

the podcast very soon as always please 

like and subscribe you can also support 

my work on patreon at patreon.com slash 

waking cosmos and to those people who 

are already doing that thank you very 

much it means a great deal ok I will see 

you next time for another episode of 

waking cosmos exploring the nature of 

consciousness and its place in reality 

until then you

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Seorang Blogger pemula yang sedang belajar